THE RESPONSE
Privacy expert sees misplaced focus after 9/11
BY LORI COLE
While Robert Ellis Smith recognizes the need for additional
steps to combat the threat of terrorism, he thinks that many of the
government's new security measures are ineffective and violations of civil
rights. During a lecture Sunday, February 24 at 2:30 p.m. at the Providence
Public Library, Smith, an activist best known as the founder of the monthly
newsletter Privacy Journal, will outline his views on preserving privacy
in the post-September 11 environment
Part of the problem, Smith believes, is the way in which anti-terrorism
measures can infringe on everyone, not just terrorists. Internet service
providers, for example, now have authority to monitor and intercept
communications without demonstrating a link to terrorism. The effect of such
measures on privacy rights often goes unquestioned, though, because of the
atmosphere of anxiety about possible threats.
Similarly, the government has prioritized airport security, but some of the
new measures do little to improve security, Smith says. More attention is being
paid to identity documents but, as Privacy Journal
(www.townonline.com/privacyjournal/) explained in October, "an estimated 20
percent of driver's licenses and state IDs used in the US are counterfeit or
issued erroneously." Smith believes a greater focus on screening luggage would
prove more effective.
While much emphasis has been placed on airport security, few precautions have
been taken to prevent terrorism in other settings. Smith recommends restricting
the sale of fertilizers that can be used to create explosives like those used
in Oklahoma City and implementing the use of tagging technology to trace such
products.
Disappointed by citizens' eagerness to relinquish privacy rights without fully
understanding the implications, Smith urges people to defy the conventional
wisdom. "Stick up for your rights," he says, adding that it's more patriotic
for people to support the Bill of Rights than to accept new laws and technology
without considering their risks. After all, privacy rights have been contested
since the time of the Revolutionary War, he notes, and despite pressure to the
contrary, "We have kept these rights in the past."
Smith's lecture is part of the Providence Public Library's continuing lecture
series, "Safe and free: Civil Liberties since September 11."
Issue Date: February 22 - 28, 2002
|